CurationWeb review
Workyard
Workyard is best for deeper construction time and location control
Choose Workyard when verified job-site time, travel, automated site allocation and cost-code labour reporting justify a specialist system. Its depth is valuable for construction, but excessive for a simple office clock.
Best fit
- Contractors that need labour tied accurately to jobs and cost codes.
- Teams paying travel time across moving crews and sites.
- Managers who need auditable approvals before payroll and job-cost reporting.
How it fits the work
Workyard connects mobile clocking with location and travel evidence, jobs, cost codes, supervisor workflows and approved exports. Higher plans add tighter geofence restrictions, scheduling and more automated allocation or correction.
What to budget for
Plans start at $6 per user per month when billed annually. Current official comparison material also indicates a $50 monthly base fee; obtain a written quote for the required plan and total users.
Where it can disappoint
- Continuous location handling needs employee transparency and tight retention rules.
- Base fees and higher-plan controls affect real cost.
- Connectivity, battery, mobile-to-web parity and reports must work on actual jobsites.
Better fits for a different priority
- ClockShark Choose it for a simpler crew clock and scheduling workflow.
- QuickBooks Time Choose it when accounting-system flow matters more than construction depth.
- Timeero Consider it when routes and mileage matter more than job costing.
- Construction time tracking software Compare field options for GPS, travel and cost codes.
- Compare all time tracking software Return to the complete shortlist and fit questions.
The decision
Workyard is the leading construction choice when location and cost-code accuracy justify the added setup. Validate base and plan costs, routes, weak connectivity, corrections and payroll posting with a real crew.