Teamwork.com
Teamwork Project Management Review and Pricing
Teamwork.com combines project tasks, messages, schedules and time records, with paid options that extend into capacity and client-delivery finances. A team can break a project into assignments, keep discussion with the work and review overlapping commitments. That makes it relevant to everyday project coordination as well as businesses delivering work for clients.
Its time and financial features give it a particular reason to enter a shortlist when completing the work and understanding the effort behind it are connected goals. Explore a real project in Teamwork.com to see how assignments, discussion and time records fit together.
From a shared plan to daily delivery
The documented setup starts with a project, divides it into tasks, invites colleagues and uses project messages for discussion. Task, list, board, Gantt and table views provide different ways to inspect the work. A team can therefore evaluate both a task-oriented daily view and the wider schedule without treating every update as a separate conversation.
Time logging is available on Free. Basics adds templates and billable time, allowing a team to distinguish recorded effort that belongs in a client-billing workflow. Accelerate adds capacity, retainers and time budgets, while higher plans extend the financial controls. The distinction matters: a record of hours and a system for planning client profitability are different buying requirements.
The Projects Chart provides a shared timeline of projects and milestones, with status and export. It respects project memberships, so the view does not automatically expose every project to every participant. Managers who need to see overlapping commitments should include the relevant memberships in their evaluation.
Teamwork pricing: Free, Basics and Accelerate
Visit Teamwork.com for up-to-date pricing in your currency and billing term. Compare Basics when billable time and templates are the requirement, or Accelerate for capacity, retainers and time budgets. Confirm paid-seat minimums and project limits in the quote before estimating the subscription.
| Plan | Documented scope | Buying implication |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Five users, five projects, multiple work views, time logging and 100 automations | A bounded starting point for a small team's project and time records. |
| Basics | Templates and billable time | Relevant when repeatable delivery and billable effort enter the workflow. |
| Accelerate | Capacity, retainers, time budgets, invoices, HubSpot and QuickBooks connections, 20,000 automations | Evaluate when planning people and client-delivery administration belong together. |
| Optimize | Quoted financial and multicurrency budgets, Salesforce and NetSuite connections | A deeper financial and system-integration discussion. |
| Enterprise | SSO, success manager, priority and implementation support | Scope identity, service and rollout requirements in a quote. |
Paid seat minimums and project limits need confirmation alongside currency. Ask which AI functions and usage allowances are included in the current offer before budgeting ongoing use.
Clients and colleagues have different licenses
Teamwork.com distinguishes paid standard users from free client users and collaborators. Client users belong to an external company and can be active on at most five projects. That can be useful for a client involved in a limited set of deliveries, but it is a material constraint if you want one client to participate across many projects.
A free client role is not the equivalent of an internal paid member. List the actions each participant needs and the number of projects they will access before calculating the subscription. The official license guidance explains those role distinctions.
Setup, integrations and support
A useful first project includes a task assignment, a message, a time entry and a milestone. If client delivery drives the purchase, add a client user and confirm what they can see and do. If the purchase is mainly internal coordination, check that the task and reporting workflow answers that need without requiring the financial features to justify the product.
HubSpot and QuickBooks are listed with Accelerate; Salesforce and NetSuite with Optimize. The presence of a named connection does not establish the exact fields, directions or permissions required by your workflow. Demonstrate a representative data exchange before making that connection part of a rollout commitment.
All plans advertise expert training and US/EU hosting; Enterprise adds implementation and priority support. Ask for the service scope that applies to the plan and hosting arrangement you intend to buy.
If moving an existing project history matters, confirm the supported import path and test assignments, dates, discussions and time records before scheduling a switch.
When another tool may fit better
Asana is a strong comparison when the central problem is clear owners, deadlines and project follow-through. It connects assignments with My Tasks and Inbox, adding portfolios and native time tracking on Advanced.
ClickUp deserves consideration if you want tasks, Docs, chat and time recording in one configurable workspace. Its broader suite is a different reason to consolidate tools from Teamwork.com's client-delivery and financial progression.
For other approaches, compare project management software by the type of work your team needs to organize.
Verdict
Teamwork.com merits consideration for teams that want shared project delivery with time records, especially when client participation, capacity and financial planning may become part of the same workflow. Its Free plan provides a bounded place to explore the foundations; the paid-plan decision depends on the delivery controls you need.
Take a representative project and your mix of internal and client roles to the provider, then confirm the applicable plan, currency and project allowance.